Centralized exchange in Chad

The BEAC views cryptocurrencies as inconsistent with the CEMAC monetary policy and the stability of its financial system. Engaging in such activities would likely be seen as a violation of existing banking and financial regulations rather than an activity requiring a specific crypto license.

BEAC Circular No. 001/GR/2022 (and related directives in 2021-2022): This circular reportedly warned financial institutions in the CEMAC zone against engaging in crypto-asset-related activities, citing risks to financial stability, money laundering, and consumer protection. While an official English version directly from the BEAC's website can be difficult to locate, its content has been widely reported by financial news outlets.

BEAC Circular No. 001/GR/2022/GR of March 28, 2022, explicitly prohibits financial institutions and all economic agents in the CEMAC region from engaging in activities related to crypto-assets, including holding, exchanging, selling, or purchasing crypto-assets. This directive was reinforced by a subsequent letter to all banks and financial institutions.

Implication: For entities operating within Chad (or any CEMAC country), the scope for legally conducting VASP activities is severely limited, if not outright eliminated. This means that domestic VASPs are effectively banned, and any attempt to operate one would be a direct violation of regional banking laws.

Evolving Stance (Strict Regulation of Virtual Assets): More recently, the BEAC has introduced a framework for "virtual assets" which, while not legalizing cryptocurrencies broadly, defines and establishes a very strict control mechanism. Regulation R-2023/CEMAC/UMAC/CM/04 of April 2023 on the Regulation of Virtual Assets in the CEMAC Zone is the cornerstone of this framework.

Crucially, Article 4 of Regulation R-2023/CEMAC/UMAC/CM/04 states that any activity relating to virtual assets (including issuance, trading, exchange, and custody) is prohibited unless expressly authorized by the BEAC.

No specific custodial license requirements exist for digital assets. This is not because the activity is unregulated, but because regulated financial institutions are generally warned against or prohibited from engaging in activities involving crypto assets.

No specific rules exist. Since regulated financial institutions are not encouraged to hold or custody digital assets, there are no established rules for segregating client assets in this context.

None. The concept of a "qualified custodian" for digital assets is not defined in Chadian or BEAC regulations.

Prohibition: The Banque des États de l'Afrique Centrale (BEAC) has issued directives (e.g., circulars in 2022 and earlier) that effectively prohibit or severely restrict cryptocurrency activities within the CEMAC zone, including Chad. These directives aim to safeguard monetary stability and prevent financial crime risks.

Implication for VASPs: This means that, currently, legally establishing and operating a VASP in Chad is highly problematic, if not outright impossible. Any operations would be considered unauthorized and potentially illegal.

Primary Legislation: Law N°004/PR/2020 modifying Law N°006/PR/2010 on the Fight against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing. This is the cornerstone legislation defining reporting obligations, predicate offenses, and the functions of the Financial Intelligence Unit.

Establishing a business relationship.

Carrying out occasional transactions above a certain threshold (e.g., EUR 1,000 equivalent for VASPs, as per FATF guidance).

Identification and Verification of Customer Identity:

Identification of Beneficial Owners: Take reasonable measures to understand the ownership and control structure of the customer and identify the natural persons who ultimately own or control the customer. This often involves identifying individuals holding 25% or more of shares or voting rights, or otherwise exercising control.

Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitor the business relationship, including scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship, to ensure that the transactions are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile.

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Apply EDD for higher-risk categories, which would typically include:

Obligation to Report: VASPs would be legally obligated to report any suspicious transactions, attempts at transactions, or activities that give rise to a suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing to Chad's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

Entity Targeted: All entities and individuals within the CEMAC zone (including Chad) engaging in or facilitating cryptocurrency activities. Violation Type: Engaging in or facilitating activities related to crypto-assets, which the BEAC deemed unauthorized, illegal, and a threat to financial stability, monetary policy, and consumer protection within the CEMAC region. Penalty Amount: The circular itself does not specify a monetary penalty for specific past violations, but rather prohibits all activities related to crypto assets and warns of "sanctions" for non-compliance. These sanctions would be determined by national authorities in adherence to the BEAC's directive. Outcome: Prohibition of crypto assets and related activities in the CEMAC region. This means that cryptocurrency exchanges, trading, and mining are effectively illegal within Chad. While specific enforcement actions against individuals or companies in Chad haven't been widely publicized, the directive provides the legal framework for such actions to be taken by Chadian authorities.

Legal Basis: United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolutions are binding on all UN member states, including Chad. Chad is required to implement these resolutions into its national law. UN sanctions typically target specific individuals, entities, and groups involved in terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, or specific conflict zones.

Legal Basis: OFAC administers and enforces U.S. economic and trade sanctions programs primarily against countries and groups of individuals, such as terrorists and narcotics traffickers. OFAC sanctions have extraterritorial reach, meaning they can apply to non-U.S. persons if their activities involve a "U.S. nexus" (e.g., using U.S. dollar clearing, U.S.-based technology, or engaging with U.S. persons).

Legal Basis: The European Union implements its own autonomous sanctions regimes, often complementing UN sanctions, and has extraterritorial reach for EU persons and entities. EU sanctions are typically imposed through Council Decisions and Regulations.