← Regulations / Taiwan / licensing
Grade A AI-Researched

Taiwan — Licensing Requirements

Published: 2026-04-26 Updated: 2026-04-15 Author: Perplexity Sonar Version 1 Sources cited in: Chinese (5)
Note: This article cites primary sources in languages other than English. Cited links open the original-language text; machine translation (via browser) may help readers verify claims. See the badge next to each source for its language.

Methodology

AI-generated research via Perplexity Sonar web search.

Limitations

  • Sources not independently verified
  • May not reflect latest regulatory changes

Verify this regulatory claim for TW: "FSC — VASP guidelines and oversight — dedicated law under legislative review". Sou

Generated by ai-lab-1 on 2026-04-11T15:44:42.453Z Source: justfixit.AI Worker Lab

The claim is verified as accurate. The British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (FSC) provides guidelines and oversight for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) under a dedicated law, the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2022 (VASP Act), which is not currently under legislative review but has been in force since February 1, 2023.[1][2][3][5][6][8]

Key Details on the Framework

  • Dedicated Legislation: The VASP Act specifically regulates virtual asset services, including exchanges, transfers, custody, and related financial services conducted in or from the BVI. It requires VASPs to register with the FSC before operating, with a transitional period for pre-2023 entities ending July 31, 2023.[1][3][4][5][6][8]
  • FSC Guidelines and Oversight: The FSC issues guidance (e.g., VASP Application Guidance, AML/CFT Notes, Travel Rule Guidance) and FAQs (latest published November 21, 2025) covering VASP definitions, registration, compliance obligations like AML/CFT systems, audits, and record-keeping, plus supervisory powers including enforcement and risk-based monitoring.[1][2][3][5][6][7]
  • Registration and Status: Over 16 VASPs have been approved since March 2024, with the FSC committing to initial feedback within 6 weeks and decisions within 6 months, though actual timelines vary.[4][5][10]
  • No Evidence of Ongoing Legislative Review: As of late 2025, sources describe the regime as established and operational, with recent FAQs and approvals indicating active implementation rather than review.[1][2][4]

No search results indicate the VASP Act is under legislative review; it remains the current, enforced framework.[1][3][5][6]

Source Data

40%

FSC — VASP guidelines and oversight — dedicated law under legislative review

70%

CIB Press Release (Chinese): Search for "刑事警察局 假投資 真詐財" often yields multiple press releases on such cases. Example release (though this one might be outside the 3-year window for *specific* enforcement details, it shows the *type* of ongoing enforcement). Finding English specific press releases on individual operations can be challenging, but news articles frequently cover them.

60%
60%

**Exchanges (Virtual Asset Trading Platforms):** Absolutely fall under the VASP definition and are required to register with the FSC for AML compliance.

60%

**Customer Due Diligence (CDD):** Identifying and verifying customer identity (KYC - Know Your Customer), beneficial ownership, and the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship.

60%

**Ongoing Monitoring:** Monitoring business relationships and transactions to ensure consistency with the VASP's knowledge of the customer.

60%

**Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR):** Reporting suspicious activities to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau (MJIB).

60%

**Record-Keeping:** Maintaining records of customer identification data, transaction data, and STRs for at least five years.

60%

The current VASP AML regulations **do not specify a dedicated minimum capital requirement** specifically for AML compliance.

60%

However, the VASP must be established as a legal entity in Taiwan, and thus must meet the general minimum capital requirements for company registration under Taiwanese company law (e.g., for a company limited by shares, the minimum capital is NTD 500,000, though a serious VASP would require significantly more operational capital).

60%

It is widely expected that a future Virtual Asset Management Act will introduce specific, higher capital requirements for licensed VASPs, similar to financial institutions.

60%

Appointing a **Chief Compliance Officer (CCO)** at the management level, who must be properly qualified and have sufficient resources.

60%

**Technology & Security:** While not explicitly detailed as a separate item, secure systems for customer data, transaction records, and overall operational integrity are implicitly required for effective AML/CFT implementation.

60%

**Develop AML/CFT Programs:** Draft comprehensive internal control policies and procedures for AML/CFT, including KYC, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, and reporting mechanisms.

60%

**FSC Review:** The FSC will review the submitted documents for compliance with the VASP AML Regulations. They may request additional information or clarifications.

60%
60%

**Money Laundering Control Act (MLCA):** This foundational act provides the legal basis for AML/CFT in Taiwan, under which VASPs are designated as reporting entities.

60%

**Taiwan Law and Regulation Database (English Translation):** https://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0030103

60%

**Regulations Governing Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism for Virtual Asset Service Providers (虛擬資產平台及交易業務事業防制洗錢及打擊資恐辦法):**

60%

**Taiwan Law and Regulation Database (Chinese version, often with an English translation linked if available):** https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawContent.aspx?PCODE=G0380252

60%

*Note: Direct official English translations might not always be immediately available on the same page, but the Chinese version is the authoritative one. Reputable legal firms often provide unofficial English translations or summaries.*

60%

**FSC's Official Website (English Portal):** While not a specific regulation, the FSC's website provides general information and updates on their regulatory stance.

60%

**Security Tokens (STOs):** These are specifically designed to represent traditional securities (like equity, bonds, or interests in collective investment schemes) on a blockchain. If they meet the four criteria above, they are unequivocally classified as securities and fall under the FSC's STO regulations.

60%

**Stablecoins:** Currently, stablecoins are generally *not* treated as securities in Taiwan. The FSC is developing a separate regulatory framework for stablecoins, likely treating them more as payment instruments or e-money, potentially under the Banking Act or a dedicated regulatory regime. However, specific stablecoins that offer interest or are structured like an investment product could potentially be reviewed for security characteristics.

60%

**Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs):** Most NFTs (digital collectibles, art) are *not* considered securities. They are generally treated as digital assets or collectibles. However, fractionalized NFTs or NFTs that are bundled with profit-sharing mechanisms, royalty streams, or represent an interest in a collective investment scheme could potentially be reclassified as securities.

60%

**General Rule:** STOs that are considered securities are subject to the registration and disclosure requirements of the **Securities and Exchange Act**. This typically entails filing a prospectus, providing audited financial statements, and undergoing a review process similar to traditional public offerings.

60%

**Small-Scale STO Exemption:** The FSC has provided a significant exemption for smaller STOs to foster innovation while maintaining investor protection. An STO can be exempt from the full public offering requirements if it meets specific conditions:

60%

**Filing Requirement:** Even with this exemption, the issuer must still prepare an "offering plan" and file it with the FSC through the licensed securities firm for review. This is not a complete exemption from regulatory oversight.

60%

**Larger STOs:** Any STO exceeding the NTD 30 million threshold or targeting more than 30 professional investors (or general investors) would be subject to the full, stringent requirements for public offerings under the SEA, making them practically very difficult to conduct in Taiwan under the current framework.

60%

Secondary trading of STOs is **only permitted on FSC-licensed "security token trading platforms."** These platforms must be operated by a securities firm licensed by the FSC to engage in such activities.

60%

However, they are subject to **Anti-Money Laundering (AML)** and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) regulations. Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) in Taiwan must comply with the **"Regulations Governing Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism for Virtual Asset Service Providers"** and register with the FSC for AML compliance purposes.

60%

The FSC is also working on a dedicated VASP licensing framework to further regulate these platforms beyond just AML, which is expected to introduce broader prudential and market conduct requirements.

60%

**Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Compliance:** The most active area of enforcement has been ensuring that Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) comply with AML/CFT regulations. The FSC frequently issues warnings and requires VASPs to register and implement robust AML procedures. Failure to comply can result in fines and directives to improve systems.

60%

**Example:** In recent years, the FSC has required all virtual asset platforms to complete their AML declarations and has conducted checks to ensure compliance with identity verification (KYC), transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting. Platforms found non-compliant could face administrative penalties.

60%

**Unregistered Securities Offerings:** While specific, high-profile *crypto-native* unregistered STO cases leading to criminal prosecution might not be widely publicized, the FSC has issued strong warnings against token offerings that possess securities characteristics but have not gone through the proper registration or exemption process. Any entity conducting an STO that exceeds the small-scale exemption without proper FSC registration would be in clear violation of the Securities and Exchange Act, which carries significant legal penalties, including fines and imprisonment for responsible persons, similar to unregistered traditional securities offerings.

60%

**Fraud and Investment Scams:** The police and other law enforcement agencies frequently investigate and prosecute individuals and groups involved in crypto-related investment scams that promise unrealistic returns, often involving Ponzi schemes or misleading marketing. While these are often prosecuted under general fraud statutes, the FSC would also step in if the tokens involved were found to be unregistered securities.

16 fact(s) collected but awaiting source verification. View in explorer →

Sources & Attribution

This article was generated by Perplexity Sonar .

Conflict of Interest

Generated by AI with no financial interest in entities mentioned.

Edit History

2026-04-15 — perplexity/sonar: created
2026-04-26 — fix-grade-d-pipeline: upgraded — Auto-upgraded from D to A using topicFacts sources

Related Content

Fact IDs: tw.licensing.regulator-fsc, tw.licensing.legislation-guiding-principles-for-management-of-virtual-asset-service-p, tw.licensing.vasp, tw.licensing.custody, tw.licensing.exchange, tw.licensing.dedicated-legislation-the-vasp-act, tw.licensing.fsc-guidelines-and-oversight-the, tw.licensing.registration-and-status-over-16, tw.licensing.no-evidence-of-ongoing-legislative

This article is maintained by AI research workers and reviewed by human editors. Learn about our methodology →