← Regulations / Ukraine / Operating Models / CEX

Centralized exchange in Ukraine

Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

CEX is conditionally permitted in Ukraine with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • VASPs are designated as 'reporting entities' (subjects of primary financial monitoring) under Law No. 361-IX 'On Preventing and Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds, Terrorist Financing and Financing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction'
  • Customer identification and verification (KYC): For individuals – full name, date of birth, place of birth, address, identification number, identity document details; For legal entities – name, registration number, legal form, legal address, management structure
  • Beneficial Owner (UBO) identification and verification required
  • Understand the purpose and intended nature of business relationship or transaction
  • Ongoing monitoring of business relationships and transactions, including source of funds and destination of virtual assets, to ensure consistency with risk profile
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, complex/unusual transactions, non-face-to-face relationships, and transactions above UAH 400,000 threshold
  • Suspicious transaction reporting to the State Financial Monitoring Service (SFMS)
  • Travel Rule obligations expected to apply (aligned with FATF recommendations for VASPs)
  • Transactions above UAH 400,000 equivalent trigger mandatory reporting thresholds, but suspicion triggers reporting even below this threshold

Key Restrictions

  • VASP license (дозвіл) required from NSSMC (for most virtual assets) or NBU (for fiat-backed stablecoins) – but the licensing mechanism is not yet fully operational due to missing secondary legislation as of late 2023/early 2024
  • Must be a legal entity incorporated in Ukraine
  • Separate accounting required for the VASP's own virtual assets vs. client virtual assets under Article 12 of the Law 'On Virtual Assets'
  • Capital requirements expected: ~UAH 10 million ($250K-$300K) for exchanges (fiat-crypto); ~UAH 5 million ($125K-$150K) for other VASP activities – indicative, pending final secondary legislation
  • Must ensure reliable and safe storage of client virtual assets (Article 16 of VA Law); specific segregation rules (e.g., distinct wallets) expected in not-yet-adopted secondary legislation
  • Insurance/bonding requirements for custodians are highly probable under pending regulatory acts but not yet detailed in current law

Key Risks

  • Licensing framework is legally in place but practically inoperable – secondary legislation (resolutions, procedures) has not been fully adopted, meaning no clear path to obtain a license as of early 2024
  • Wartime priorities have deprioritized full implementation of the VA Law – regulatory uncertainty and delays expected
  • Heavy reliance on not-yet-published secondary legislation for critical details (capital requirements, segregation rules, insurance, cold storage mandates)
  • SFMS AML/CFT enforcement authority is active, creating potential gap where VASPs must comply with AML obligations but lack a functioning licensing pathway
  • The NSSMC and NBU have overlapping jurisdictional claims (fiat-backed vs. other virtual assets) which could cause regulatory ambiguity for exchanges operating across asset types

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

Law of Ukraine "On Virtual Assets" (Закон України "Про віртуальні активи"): Link to Ukrainian Parliament (Verkhovna Rada) website - official legislative acts (You may need to use a translation tool for the full text).

licensing 60% confidence

While the VA Law is in force, its full implementation, particularly the practical licensing mechanism, depends on the adoption of secondary legislation (resolutions, procedures, and detailed requirements) by the NBU and MinDigital.

licensing 60% confidence

As of late 2023/early 2024, this secondary legislation has not yet been fully adopted, meaning the actual process for obtaining a license is largely suspended or not fully operational. The focus of the government has been on wartime priorities.

licensing 60% confidence

Exchange services between virtual assets and fiat currencies. (This covers traditional crypto exchanges).

licensing 60% confidence

Exchange services between different virtual assets. (Also covered by crypto exchanges).

Evidence fact ua.licensing.transfer-of-virtual-assets not found (may have been renamed).

licensing 60% confidence

Custody and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets. (This covers custody providers).

licensing 60% confidence

Exchanges (Trading Platforms): Will require a VASP license covering "exchange services."

licensing 60% confidence

Custody Providers: Will require a VASP license covering "custody and/or administration services."

licensing 60% confidence

Currently, the exact, officially finalized capital requirements are pending the adoption of secondary legislation.

licensing 60% confidence

For exchanges (providers of exchange services between virtual assets and fiat): Potentially around UAH 10 million (approx. $250,000 - $300,000, subject to exchange rate fluctuations).

licensing 60% confidence

For other VASP activities (e.g., custody, transfer): Potentially around UAH 5 million (approx. $125,000 - $150,000).

licensing 60% confidence

These are indicative figures from drafts and should be verified once official regulations are published.

licensing 60% confidence

State Financial Monitoring Service of Ukraine (SFMS): Responsible for financial monitoring of transactions with virtual assets and ensuring compliance with AML/CFT legislation.

licensing 60% confidence

National Bank of Ukraine (NBU): Responsible for the regulation of virtual assets secured by currency (fiat-backed stablecoins) and for payment services involving virtual assets.

licensing 60% confidence

Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine (MinDigital): Responsible for the regulation of other types of virtual assets, including licensing of Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs).

custody 60% confidence

Mandate: The Law "On Virtual Assets" mandates that any entity providing virtual asset services, including custody services, must obtain a permit (дозвіл). This permit functions similarly to a license.

custody 60% confidence

Definition of VASP: Article 1 of the Law defines a "Virtual Asset Service Provider" (VASP) as a legal entity that, as part of its business activities, performs one or more of the following services for or on behalf of another natural or legal person:

custody 60% confidence

Safekeeping and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets. (This directly covers custody).

custody 60% confidence

Issuing Authority: The NSSMC is generally responsible for issuing these permits. For virtual assets secured by monetary values, the NBU would be the responsible authority.

custody 60% confidence

Specific Conditions: While the Law mandates permits, the specific conditions and procedures for obtaining these permits (e.g., capital requirements, personnel qualifications, technical requirements) are to be established by normative legal acts of the NSSMC and NBU. These specific acts are still largely in development or pending full implementation.

custody 60% confidence

Separate Accounting: Article 12, Part 2, Point 2 requires VASPs to maintain separate accounting records for their own virtual assets and those of their clients. This is a foundational step towards ensuring client assets are not commingled with the VASP's proprietary assets.

custody 60% confidence

Operational Requirements: The detailed operational requirements, which would likely include specific rules for asset segregation (e.g., distinct wallet addresses, clear identification of beneficial ownership), are expected to be elaborated in the secondary legislation and regulatory acts to be adopted by the NSSMC.

custody 60% confidence

The Law "On Virtual Assets" (Article 16, Part 2, Point 2) requires VASPs to ensure the reliable and safe storage of virtual assets and/or instruments enabling control over them. While the law doesn't explicitly use the term "segregation" in the same way traditional finance does for client funds (e.g., separate bank accounts), the underlying principle of protecting client assets is implied through:

custody 60% confidence

However, it is a common regulatory practice in other jurisdictions for financial service providers, especially custodians, to have sufficient capital, insurance, or bonding to cover potential losses due to cyber-attacks, operational failures, or fraud.

custody 60% confidence

It is highly probable that such requirements will be included in the specific licensing conditions and regulatory acts that the NSSMC and NBU are tasked with developing for VASPs. These would aim to ensure the financial stability of custodians and protect client interests.

aml 60% confidence

Law of Ukraine No. 361-IX "On Preventing and Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds, Terrorist Financing and Financing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction" (dated December 6, 2019, with subsequent amendments).

aml 60% confidence

Law of Ukraine No. 2074-IX "On Virtual Assets" (dated February 17, 2022).

aml 60% confidence

This is the foundational AML/CFT law in Ukraine, bringing the country's framework closer to FATF recommendations and the EU's 4th and 5th AML Directives. It designates "virtual asset service providers" as "reporting entities" (subjects of primary financial monitoring).

aml 60% confidence

Identification and Verification:

aml 60% confidence

For Individuals: Obtain and verify the customer's identity, including full name, date of birth, place of birth, address, identification number (where applicable), and details of the identity document (series, number, date of issue, issuing authority). Verification must be based on reliable, independent source documents, data, or information.

aml 60% confidence

For Legal Entities: Obtain and verify the legal entity's name, registration number, legal form, legal address, contact details, and identify the management structure.

aml 60% confidence

Beneficial Owner (UBO) Identification: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer. This is crucial for both individuals (e.g., if acting on behalf of another) and legal entities.

aml 60% confidence

Understanding the Business Relationship:

aml 60% confidence

Conduct ongoing monitoring of the business relationship and transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure consistency with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile. This includes monitoring the source of funds and the destination of virtual assets.

aml 60% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD):

aml 60% confidence

Customers who are Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), their family members, or closely associated persons.

aml 60% confidence

Transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions.

aml 60% confidence

Complex, unusually large, or unusual patterns of transactions that have no apparent economic or lawful purpose.

aml 60% confidence

Non-face-to-face business relationships without adequate safeguards.

aml 60% confidence

Transactions above specific thresholds (e.g., equivalent of UAH 400,000 for certain types of operations, though suspicion requires reporting even below this).

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a centralized exchange can legally operate in Ukraine under the Law "On Virtual Assets" by obtaining a VASP license (дозвіл) from the NSSMC (or NBU for fiat-backed assets), but the licensing mechanism is not yet fully operational due to missing secondary legislation; AML/CFT obligations under Law No. 361-IX are already in effect and apply to VASPs as reporting entities.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What exchange / VASP license applies?
  • What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
  • What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
  • What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?