Self-custodial wallet / non-custodial software in Ukraine
Publisher of software where users hold their own private keys. The publisher never holds, controls, or has access to user funds.
Self-custodial wallet is conditionally permitted in Ukraine with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Medium
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- VASPs are designated as 'reporting entities' (subjects of primary financial monitoring) under Law No. 361-IX 'On Preventing and Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds, Terrorist Financing…' (ua.aml.law-of-ukraine-no-361-ix)
- Customer identification and verification: full name, DOB, place of birth, address, ID document details for individuals; name, registration number, legal form, address, management structure for legal entities (ua.aml.identification-and-verification, ua.aml.for-individuals-obtain-and-verify, ua.aml.for-legal-entities-obtain-and)
- Beneficial owner (UBO) identification — verify identity of beneficial owner(s) (ua.aml.beneficial-owner-ubo-identification-identify)
- Understand purpose and intended nature of the business relationship (ua.aml.understanding-the-business-relationship, ua.aml.understand-the-purpose-and-intended)
- Ongoing monitoring of business relationships and transactions, including source and destination of funds (ua.aml.conduct-ongoing-monitoring-of-the)
- Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, complex/unusual transactions, non-face-to-face relationships, and transactions above ~UAH 400,000 (ua.aml.enhanced-due-diligence-edd, ua.aml.customers-who-are-politically-exposed, ua.aml.transactions-involving-high-risk-jurisdictions, ua.aml.complex-unusually-large-or-unusual, ua.aml.non-face-to-face-business-relationships-without-adequate, ua.aml.transactions-above-specific-thresholds-eg)
- Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) may be applied in lower-risk situations but is limited given inherent virtual-asset risks (ua.aml.simplified-due-diligence-sdd, ua.aml.may-be-applied-in-situations)
- Reporting of suspicious transactions to the State Financial Monitoring Service (SFMS) (ua.aml.law-of-ukraine-no-361-ix)
Key Restrictions
- A self-custodial wallet publisher that never holds, controls, or has access to user funds may still fall under the VASP definition if it provides services 'for or on behalf of another' — specifically 'safekeeping and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets' (ua.custody.safekeeping-andor-administration-of-virtual, ua.custody.definition-of-vasp-article-1); this creates ambiguity
- Must obtain a VASP permit (license) from MinDigital/NSSMC (or NBU for fiat-backed assets) — however, the licensing mechanism is largely suspended/not yet operational as of late 2023/early 2024 due to missing secondary legislation (ua.licensing.as-of-late-2023early-2024, ua.licensing.while-the-va-law-is)
- Must be a legal entity incorporated in Ukraine (ua.custody.definition-of-vasp-article-1 defines VASP as a 'legal entity')
- Potential indicative capital requirements: ~UAH 5 million (~$125k-150k) for custody/transfer activities (ua.licensing.for-other-vasp-activities-eg, ua.licensing.however-previous-drafts-and-discussions)
- Requirement for separate accounting of client vs. proprietary virtual assets (ua.custody.separate-accounting-article-12-part)
Key Risks
- Licensing regime is in limbo — secondary legislation not fully adopted; practical license applications may be suspended (ua.licensing.as-of-late-2023early-2024)
- Regulatory ambiguity: it is unclear whether pure non-custodial software publishers that never touch user keys are captured as VASPs under 'instruments enabling control over virtual assets' (ua.custody.safekeeping-andor-administration-of-virtual)
- Wartime regulatory environment — government focus on defense priorities means slow regulatory progress and potential enforcement gaps or sudden changes
- Enforcement exposure under Criminal Code and Code of Administrative Offenses for unlicensed VASP activity (ua.enforcement.legal-basis-criminal-code-of)
- Insurance/bonding requirements may be introduced in secondary legislation, creating additional compliance costs (ua.custody.it-is-highly-probable-that)
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Law of Ukraine "On Virtual Assets" (Закон України "Про віртуальні активи"): Link to Ukrainian Parliament (Verkhovna Rada) website - official legislative acts (You may need to use a translation tool for the full text).
While the VA Law is in force, its full implementation, particularly the practical licensing mechanism, depends on the adoption of secondary legislation (resolutions, procedures, and detailed requirements) by the NBU and MinDigital.
As of late 2023/early 2024, this secondary legislation has not yet been fully adopted, meaning the actual process for obtaining a license is largely suspended or not fully operational. The focus of the government has been on wartime priorities.
Custody and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets. (This covers custody providers).
Custody Providers: Will require a VASP license covering "custody and/or administration services."
For other VASP activities (e.g., custody, transfer): Potentially around UAH 5 million (approx. $125,000 - $150,000).
This is a cornerstone of the VA Law and is largely aligned with international standards (FATF recommendations).
Law of Ukraine No. 361-IX "On Preventing and Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds, Terrorist Financing and Financing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction" (dated December 6, 2019, with subsequent amendments).
This is the foundational AML/CFT law in Ukraine, bringing the country's framework closer to FATF recommendations and the EU's 4th and 5th AML Directives. It designates "virtual asset service providers" as "reporting entities" (subjects of primary financial monitoring).
Identification and Verification:
For Individuals: Obtain and verify the customer's identity, including full name, date of birth, place of birth, address, identification number (where applicable), and details of the identity document (series, number, date of issue, issuing authority). Verification must be based on reliable, independent source documents, data, or information.
For Legal Entities: Obtain and verify the legal entity's name, registration number, legal form, legal address, contact details, and identify the management structure.
Beneficial Owner (UBO) Identification: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer. This is crucial for both individuals (e.g., if acting on behalf of another) and legal entities.
Understanding the Business Relationship:
Understand the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship or transaction.
Conduct ongoing monitoring of the business relationship and transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure consistency with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile. This includes monitoring the source of funds and the destination of virtual assets.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD):
Customers who are Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), their family members, or closely associated persons.
Transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions.
Complex, unusually large, or unusual patterns of transactions that have no apparent economic or lawful purpose.
Non-face-to-face business relationships without adequate safeguards.
Transactions above specific thresholds (e.g., equivalent of UAH 400,000 for certain types of operations, though suspicion requires reporting even below this).
Simplified Due Diligence (SDD):
May be applied in situations identified as lower risk, but VASPs must still be able to demonstrate that the risk is genuinely lower and maintain sufficient information to identify the customer and beneficial owner. Given the inherent risks associated with virtual assets, SDD is often limited in this sector.
Definition of VASP: Article 1 of the Law defines a "Virtual Asset Service Provider" (VASP) as a legal entity that, as part of its business activities, performs one or more of the following services for or on behalf of another natural or legal person:
Safekeeping and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets. (This directly covers custody).
Separate Accounting: Article 12, Part 2, Point 2 requires VASPs to maintain separate accounting records for their own virtual assets and those of their clients. This is a foundational step towards ensuring client assets are not commingled with the VASP's proprietary assets.
Mandate: The Law "On Virtual Assets" mandates that any entity providing virtual asset services, including custody services, must obtain a permit (дозвіл). This permit functions similarly to a license.
AML/CFT Compliance: Obtaining a permit is intrinsically linked to strict adherence to the AML/CFT Law, including KYC procedures, transaction monitoring, and reporting suspicious activities.
Issuing Authority: The NSSMC is generally responsible for issuing these permits. For virtual assets secured by monetary values, the NBU would be the responsible authority.
Legal Basis: Criminal Code of Ukraine (Кримінальний кодекс України), Code of Administrative Offenses of Ukraine (Кодекс України про адміністративні правопорушення).
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — non-custodial wallet software publishers likely fall under Ukraine's VASP definition (via 'instruments enabling control over virtual assets') and must obtain a VASP permit with AML obligations, but the licensing mechanism is not fully operational due to missing secondary legislation, creating significant regulatory uncertainty.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- Does software publishing trigger VASP / MSB classification?
- Do AML obligations attach when no custody exists?
- What disclosure or consumer-protection rules apply?