Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in Ukraine
Issues a fiat-pegged stablecoin to the public, operates redemption, and holds reserves backing the float.
Stablecoin issuer is conditionally permitted in Ukraine with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- VASPs (including stablecoin issuers/redeemers) are designated as 'reporting entities' (subjects of primary financial monitoring) under Law No. 361-IX 'On Preventing and Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds, Terrorist Financing and Financing of the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction' (ua.aml.law-of-ukraine-no-361-ix)
- Must conduct customer identification and verification (KYC) — obtain full name, date of birth, address, ID details for individuals; registration details, management structure for legal entities (ua.aml.identification-and-verification)
- Must identify and verify beneficial owners (UBOs) of customers (ua.aml.beneficial-owner-ubo-identification-identify)
- Must conduct ongoing transaction monitoring to ensure consistency with knowledge of customer and risk profile (ua.aml.conduct-ongoing-monitoring-of-the)
- Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, complex/unusual transactions, non-face-to-face relationships, and transactions above thresholds (e.g. equivalent of UAH 400,000) (ua.aml.enhanced-due-diligence-edd)
- Must report suspicious transactions to the State Financial Monitoring Service of Ukraine (SFMS) (ua.aml.transactions-above-specific-thresholds-eg)
- Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) may be applied only in demonstrably lower-risk situations; limited applicability for virtual assets (ua.aml.simplified-due-diligence-sdd)
Key Restrictions
- A VASP license from the NBU (for fiat-pegged stablecoins) is required — issuance is not possible without it (ua.stablecoin.nbu-licenses-vasps-dealing-with, ua.stablecoin.the-law-on-virtual-assets)
- Must be a legal entity incorporated in Ukraine (ua.custody.definition-of-vasp-article-1: VASP defined as a legal entity performing services as part of its business activities)
- Full and appropriate backing (1:1 reserve) of the stablecoin by the underlying fiat currency (ua.stablecoin.full-backing-for-secured-virtual) — algorithmic or under-collateralized stablecoins are effectively prohibited (ua.stablecoin.lack-of-direct-backing-algorithmic)
- Must maintain separate accounting records for own virtual assets vs. clients' virtual assets (ua.custody.separate-accounting-article-12-part)
- Practical licensing mechanism suspended as of late 2023/early 2024 — secondary legislation (NBU regulations on reserve composition, segregation, audit, redemption timelines) not yet fully adopted due to wartime priorities (ua.licensing.as-of-late-2023early-2024)
- Stablecoins pegged to fiat currency are under NBU jurisdiction — not NSSMC or MinDigital (ua.stablecoin.stablecoins-pegged-to-fiat-currency)
- Virtual assets (including stablecoins) are explicitly NOT legal tender, electronic money, or securities under Ukrainian law — they are a distinct category of 'secured virtual assets' (ua.stablecoin.virtual-assets-vs-electronic-moneysecurities)
Key Risks
- Regulatory framework is enacted but not yet fully operational — licensing and detailed requirements (reserve segregation, audit, redemption mechanics) await NBU secondary legislation, creating a de facto suspension in the licensing regime (ua.licensing.as-of-late-2023early-2024, ua.stablecoin.specifics-the-nbu-for-fiat-pegged)
- Wartime conditions mean licensing and supervision are not a government priority — timeline for operational regime is uncertain
- Tax treatment is unsettled — the Law 'On Virtual Assets' did not introduce specific tax rules for VAs; general PIT/CIT rates apply (18%+1.5% military levy for individuals, 18% CIT for entities), and VAT treatment of issuance/redemption remains ambiguous (ua.tax.current-interpretation-profits-derived-from, ua.tax.services-related-to-virtual-assets)
- Algorithmic stablecoin structures face a high risk of being non-compliant with the 'full and appropriate backing' requirement (ua.stablecoin.lack-of-direct-backing-algorithmic)
- Lack of explicit insurance/bonding requirements in primary law — may be imposed in secondary legislation with unknown scope (ua.custody.the-law-on-virtual-assets does not explicitly detail insurance or bonding)
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Law of Ukraine "On Virtual Assets" (№ 2724-IX): Adopted by the Verkhovna Rada (Parliament) on 6 September 2022 and signed into law by the President on 15 March 2023. This is the foundational law.
Note: While the law is enacted, its full operation depends on amendments to tax legislation and the adoption of various sub-regulatory acts by the NBU and NSSMC.
Law of Ukraine "On Payment Services" (№ 1591-IX): Adopted on 30 June 2021. This law defines electronic money and payment services. The Law "On Virtual Assets" explicitly distinguishes virtual assets from electronic money under this law.
National Bank of Ukraine (NBU): Responsible for regulating virtual assets that are secured by currency values (e.g., fiat-pegged stablecoins) and for supervising virtual asset service providers (VASPs) that provide services with such assets. It also oversees payment services and electronic money.
Virtual Assets vs. Electronic Money/Securities: The Law "On Virtual Assets" categorizes virtual assets as intangible goods, explicitly stating that virtual assets are not legal tender, electronic money, or securities.
"Secured Virtual Assets" (Забезпечені віртуальні активи): This is the category most relevant to stablecoins. A "secured virtual asset" is defined as a virtual asset that is secured by a certain object (money, other virtual assets, certain property rights, etc.).
Stablecoins pegged to fiat currency (e.g., USD, EUR, UAH) would primarily fall under "secured virtual assets" whose underlying asset is a currency value. These types of stablecoins and related services are under the NBU's jurisdiction.
Full Backing: For "secured virtual assets" (which includes stablecoins), the Law "On Virtual Assets" generally mandates full and appropriate backing of the virtual asset by the underlying asset (e.g., fiat currency, other virtual assets, or property rights).
Specifics: The NBU (for fiat-pegged stablecoins) and the NSSMC (for other secured virtual assets) are expected to establish detailed requirements regarding the nature, location, and segregation of reserves, as well as audit requirements, through their sub-regulatory acts. These specifics are critical and are still awaited.
The Law "On Virtual Assets" introduces a licensing regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). This includes entities that issue virtual assets (including stablecoins), facilitate their exchange, transfer, storage, or provide other related services.
NBU: Licenses VASPs dealing with secured virtual assets whose underlying asset is currency value (i.e., fiat-pegged stablecoins) and those offering services with such assets.
Issuer Obligation: Issuers of secured virtual assets are expected to ensure the possibility of redemption, though the precise mechanisms and timelines for this will be detailed in the NBU's or NSSMC's specific regulations.
Lack of Direct Backing: Algorithmic stablecoins, by definition, do not typically maintain a 1:1 reserve in fiat currency or other tangible assets. This lack of direct "backing by a certain object" may mean they do not qualify as "secured virtual assets" under the Ukrainian law.
As of late 2023/early 2024, this secondary legislation has not yet been fully adopted, meaning the actual process for obtaining a license is largely suspended or not fully operational. The focus of the government has been on wartime priorities.
Participation in and provision of financial services related to the issuance/sale of virtual assets.
Exchanges (Trading Platforms): Will require a VASP license covering "exchange services."
Currently, the exact, officially finalized capital requirements are pending the adoption of secondary legislation.
This is a cornerstone of the VA Law and is largely aligned with international standards (FATF recommendations).
Definition of VASP: Article 1 of the Law defines a "Virtual Asset Service Provider" (VASP) as a legal entity that, as part of its business activities, performs one or more of the following services for or on behalf of another natural or legal person:
Safekeeping and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets. (This directly covers custody).
Separate Accounting: Article 12, Part 2, Point 2 requires VASPs to maintain separate accounting records for their own virtual assets and those of their clients. This is a foundational step towards ensuring client assets are not commingled with the VASP's proprietary assets.
Issuing Authority: The NSSMC is generally responsible for issuing these permits. For virtual assets secured by monetary values, the NBU would be the responsible authority.
AML/CFT Compliance: Obtaining a permit is intrinsically linked to strict adherence to the AML/CFT Law, including KYC procedures, transaction monitoring, and reporting suspicious activities.
Law of Ukraine No. 361-IX "On Preventing and Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds, Terrorist Financing and Financing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction" (dated December 6, 2019, with subsequent amendments).
Identification and Verification:
Beneficial Owner (UBO) Identification: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer. This is crucial for both individuals (e.g., if acting on behalf of another) and legal entities.
Conduct ongoing monitoring of the business relationship and transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure consistency with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile. This includes monitoring the source of funds and the destination of virtual assets.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD):
Transactions above specific thresholds (e.g., equivalent of UAH 400,000 for certain types of operations, though suspicion requires reporting even below this).
Simplified Due Diligence (SDD):
Current Interpretation: Profits derived from virtual asset transactions (e.g., selling cryptocurrency for fiat currency, exchanging one cryptocurrency for another at a profit, receiving crypto as payment for services) are generally treated as other investment income or simply other taxable income.
Personal Income Tax (PIT): 18%
Military Levy: 1.5%
Tax Rate: Corporate Income Tax (CIT): 18% on the taxable profit.
Services related to virtual assets (e.g., exchange fees charged by a virtual asset service provider, custodial services, brokerage services) might be subject to VAT (20%) if they qualify as taxable services performed in Ukraine.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — stablecoin issuance/redeeming is recognized under the 'secured virtual asset' framework of the Law 'On Virtual Assets' and will require an NBU VASP license, full fiat backing, local incorporation, and AML compliance; however, the licensing regime is not yet operationally implemented due to war-delayed secondary legislation, creating a de facto suspension of new market entry.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What e-money or banking license is required to issue?
- What reserve composition, segregation, and audit rules apply?
- What redemption rights must be granted to holders?
- Are foreign-issued stablecoins permitted for use locally?