DeFi protocol frontend in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

The Proceeds of Crime Act, 2013 (as amended): This act criminalizes money laundering and terrorist financing offenses and provides for the forfeiture of assets derived from criminal conduct.

The Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism Act, 2017 (as amended): This is the principal legislation outlining the obligations for financial institutions and DNFBPs to prevent and detect money laundering and terrorist financing. It defines key terms, outlines reporting obligations, and sets out penalties for non-compliance.

The Financial Intelligence Unit Act, 2001 (as amended): This act establishes the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and defines its powers and functions, including receiving and analyzing suspicious transaction reports.

Identify and Verify Customer Identity:

For natural persons: Obtain full name, residential address, date of birth, nationality, and a unique identification number (e.g., passport, national ID card). Verification typically requires independent, reliable source documents.

For legal persons/entities: Obtain legal name, address of registered office and principal place of business, incorporation details (e.g., certificate of incorporation, articles of association), and identify beneficial owners (those who ultimately own or control 25% or more of the entity).

Understand the Purpose and Intended Nature of the Business Relationship: Gather information about why the customer is seeking the services and how they intend to use them.

Conduct Ongoing Monitoring: Regularly review the business relationship and transactions undertaken to ensure they are consistent with the entity's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile, including (where necessary) the source of funds.

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Required for high-risk customers, such as Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), customers from high-risk jurisdictions, or transactions involving complex structures or unusually large amounts. This involves more rigorous verification, deeper understanding of source of funds/wealth, and higher-level approval for establishing relationships.

Obligation to Report: All reporting entities (which would include VASPs if their activities are considered relevant financial business) have a legal obligation to report any transaction (or attempted transaction) where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are the proceeds of criminal activity or are linked to terrorist financing.

Recipient: Reports must be submitted to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Timeliness: STRs must be filed promptly, "without delay," upon forming the suspicion.

No Tipping-Off: It is an offense to disclose to the customer or any third party that a suspicious transaction report has been or will be made.

Retention Period: Records must generally be kept for a minimum of five (5) years after the business relationship has ended or after the date of the transaction.

Financial Services Authority (FSA):

Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU):

Entity Targeted: General public and entities falsely claiming to be regulated by the SVG FSA for virtual asset business. Violation Type: Operating or advertising virtual asset business activities without proper licensing under the Virtual Asset Business Act, 2020 (VABA), or misrepresenting regulatory status. Penalty Amount: Not applicable to general warnings; specific penalties for unlicensed operation would be determined if an investigation led to a formal enforcement action, which typically isn't publicly detailed. Outcome: Increased public awareness, pressure on unlicensed entities to cease operations or comply, and a clear stance from the regulator.

Entity Targeted: All virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and the general public, including those considering operating in or from SVG. Violation Type: N/A (this is a regulatory clarification, not an enforcement action itself). However, entities failing to register or comply with VABA would be in violation. Penalty Amount: N/A. Outcome: Enhanced clarity on legal obligations for VASPs, driving compliance with registration requirements, AML/CFT measures, and consumer protection. This sets the stage for future enforcement by defining what constitutes a violation.

Outcome: Increased public awareness, pressure on unlicensed entities to cease operations or comply, and a clear stance from the regulator.

Outcome: Enhanced clarity on legal obligations for VASPs, driving compliance with registration requirements, AML/CFT measures, and consumer protection. This sets the stage for future enforcement by defining what constitutes a violation.