Regulatory Bodies
Regulatory body data collection in progress for Monaco. Our AI research workers are actively gathering this information.
Operating Models
0/9 verdictsCan specific business models operate in Monaco? Each card answers the operational question for one kind of operator. Curated cells reflect counsel-grade review; AI-generated cells should be confirmed before relying on them.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
No verdict yet — falls back to topic articles below.
Primary Legislation
| Law / Regulation | Year | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| For pure AML/CFT registration with SICCFIN, there are generally **no specific pr | 2026 | For pure AML/CFT registration with SICCFIN, there are generally **no specific prescribed minimum capital requirements di... |
| **Establish a Local Entity:** Incorporate a company in Monaco in accordance with | 2026 | **Establish a Local Entity:** Incorporate a company in Monaco in accordance with Monégasque company law. |
| **Develop Compliance Framework:** Draft comprehensive internal AML/CFT policies | 2026 | **Develop Compliance Framework:** Draft comprehensive internal AML/CFT policies and procedures, risk assessment framewor... |
| Law No. 1.362 of July 8, 2009, as amended, relating to the fight against money laundering, terrorist financing, and corruption | 2009 | **Loi n° 1.362 du 8 juillet 2009 modifiée relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terro... |
| virtual assets | 2026 | This is the cornerstone AML/CFT law in Monaco. It defines "virtual assets" and "virtual asset service providers" and sub... |
| Journal de Monaco | 2026 | **Access:** This law and its amendments are publicly available via the "Journal de Monaco" (Official Gazette). For the m... |
| *While a direct, stable URL to the consolidated law might be difficult due to fr | 2026 | *While a direct, stable URL to the consolidated law might be difficult due to frequent updates and legislative portals, ... |
| Législation et Réglementation | 2026 | You can typically find references to the law and its implementing ordinances in the "Législation et Réglementation" or "... |
| Sovereign Ordinance No. 8.604 of November 17, 2021 | 2021 | **Ordonnance Souveraine n° 8.604 du 17 novembre 2021 (Sovereign Ordinance No. 8.604 of November 17, 2021):** |
| This is a crucial implementing ordinance that details the application of Law No. | 2026 | This is a crucial implementing ordinance that details the application of Law No. 1.362, particularly regarding the defin... |
| **Access:** Like Law 1.362, this ordinance is published in the Journal de Monaco | 2026 | **Access:** Like Law 1.362, this ordinance is published in the Journal de Monaco and referenced by SICCFIN. |
| **Note:** If an exchange deals with tokens that are classified as securities und | 2026 | **Note:** If an exchange deals with tokens that are classified as securities under Monégasque law, it might also fall un... |
Licensing Requirements
**SICCFIN (Service d'Information et de Contrôle sur les Circuits Financiers):** This is Monaco's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and the primary authority for AML/CFT supervision. SICCFIN is responsible for defining and overseeing the AML/CFT obligations of VASPs.
**CCAF (Commission de Contrôle des Activités Financières):** The financial markets supervisory authority in Monaco. While not directly responsible for "crypto licenses" in the broader sense, the CCAF would be involved if a virtual asset activity falls under the scope of existing regulated financial services (e.g., if a crypto asset is deemed a security, or if investment advice related to crypto is provided).
**Exchanges (Virtual Asset Service Providers - VASP):**
**Requirement:** **Registration with SICCFIN** for AML/CFT purposes.
**Scope:** This applies to platforms facilitating the exchange between virtual assets and fiat currencies, and between one or more forms of virtual assets.
**Custody Providers (Virtual Asset Service Providers - VASP):**
**Scope:** This includes entities that provide safekeeping or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets (e.g., private keys) on behalf of clients.
**If handling virtual assets (e.g., converting crypto to fiat for merchants):** The virtual asset component of the service would likely qualify the entity as a **VASP, requiring registration with SICCFIN.**
**If handling traditional fiat payments (e.g., processing card payments, traditional money remittance):** These activities fall under existing payment services regulations. Depending on the exact nature, a license or authorization from the CCAF might be required if the activity constitutes a regulated financial service.
**Customer Due Diligence (CDD):** Implementing robust procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of clients (Know Your Customer - KYC), including beneficial owners, and understanding the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship.
**Ongoing Monitoring:** Continuous monitoring of business relationships and transactions to ensure consistency with the institution's knowledge of the customer and their risk profile.
**Record-Keeping:** Maintaining records of customer identification data, transactions, and risk assessments for a specified period (typically 5-10 years).
**Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR):** Establishing internal procedures for identifying and reporting suspicious transactions to SICCFIN.
**Risk Assessment:** Implementing a comprehensive, risk-based approach to AML/CFT, including institutional risk assessments and client risk profiling.
**Internal Controls:** Developing and implementing internal AML/CFT policies, procedures, and controls, including the appointment of an AML/CFT Compliance Officer.
A local entity (e.g., a Monégasque company) is generally required to operate as a VASP in Monaco.
The entity must have a physical presence, management, and operational substance within the Principality.
For pure AML/CFT registration with SICCFIN, there are generally **no specific prescribed minimum capital requirements directly stemming from the AML law itself** for VASPs, unlike for CCAF-regulated entities.
However, the entity must demonstrate financial solvency and sufficient resources to operate its business responsibly and comply with its obligations. If a CCAF license is also required for certain activities, then specific capital requirements *will* apply for those licensed activities.
Management and key personnel of the VASP must demonstrate competence, integrity, and good repute.
Shareholders and beneficial owners are also subject to scrutiny.
**Establish a Local Entity:** Incorporate a company in Monaco in accordance with Monégasque company law.
**Develop Compliance Framework:** Draft comprehensive internal AML/CFT policies and procedures, risk assessment frameworks, and client due diligence protocols, all tailored to the VASP's specific business model and compliant with Monégasque law and FATF standards.
**Prepare Documentation:** Gather all required documentation, which typically includes:
Detailed business plan outlining the services, target market, operational model.
Legal formation documents of the Monégasque entity.
Information on ownership structure, beneficial owners, directors, and key management (including CVs, police records, financial standing).
Proof of local presence (e.g., office lease).
Technology and security audit reports (if applicable).
**Pre-Application Meeting (Optional but Recommended):** Engage with SICCFIN to discuss the proposed business model and ensure a clear understanding of expectations.
**Submit Registration Application:** Lodge the formal application and all supporting documents with SICCFIN.
**Due Diligence and Review:** SICCFIN will review the application, conduct due diligence on the entity, its owners, and management, and assess the robustness of the proposed AML/CFT framework. This may involve requests for further information or clarification.
**Approval/Registration:** Upon successful completion of the review, SICCFIN will register the entity as a VASP.
**Loi n° 1.362 du 8 juillet 2009 modifiée relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terrorisme et la corruption (Law No. 1.362 of July 8, 2009, as amended, relating to the fight against money laundering, terrorist financing, and corruption):**
This is the cornerstone AML/CFT law in Monaco. It defines "virtual assets" and "virtual asset service providers" and subjects them to AML/CFT obligations. The law has been amended multiple times to align with international standards, including FATF Recommendation 15 on virtual assets.
**Access:** This law and its amendments are publicly available via the "Journal de Monaco" (Official Gazette). For the most up-to-date consolidated version, it's often best to consult legal databases or the SICCFIN website for guidance.
*While a direct, stable URL to the consolidated law might be difficult due to frequent updates and legislative portals, the **SICCFIN website** is the best starting point for official information and guidance related to this law:* https://www.siccfin.mc/
**Ordonnance Souveraine n° 8.604 du 17 novembre 2021 (Sovereign Ordinance No. 8.604 of November 17, 2021):**
This is a crucial implementing ordinance that details the application of Law No. 1.362, particularly regarding the definitions and specific obligations for VASPs. It provides the detailed regulatory requirements.
**Access:** Like Law 1.362, this ordinance is published in the Journal de Monaco and referenced by SICCFIN.
*Search on SICCFIN website or official Monaco government legislative portal for "Ordonnance Souveraine 8.604" or "VASPs."*
**Note:** If an exchange deals with tokens that are classified as securities under Monégasque law, it might also fall under the purview of the CCAF and require additional licenses as an investment firm or similar entity.
AML/KYC Requirements
**Loi n° 1.362 du 3 août 2009 relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terrorisme et la corruption (consolidated version often available through legal databases):** Access via Journal de Monaco – search for "Loi 1.362" and its modifications for the most up-to-date text
This is the foundational AML/CFT law in Monaco. It has been significantly amended over the years to incorporate international standards, including those related to virtual assets. It defines "obliged entities" and outlines their general AML/CFT responsibilities.
**Ordonnance Souveraine n° 8.182 du 10 mars 2021 portant modification de l'ordonnance souveraine n° 2.318 du 3 août 2009 d'application de la loi n° 1.362 du 3 août 2009 modifiée, relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terrorisme et la corruption, modifiée (Sovereign Ordinance No. 8.182 of March 10, 2021 amending Sovereign Ordinance No. 2.318 of August 3, 2009 implementing Law No. 1.362 of August 3, 2009, as amended, on the fight against money laundering, terrorist financing, and corruption)**
This is the critical piece of legislation specifically bringing virtual asset activities and VASPs under the scope of Monaco's AML/CFT regime. It defines virtual assets and virtual asset service providers and subjects them to the same AML/CFT obligations as traditional financial institutions.
It also stipulates that individuals or legal entities wishing to carry out VASP activities in Monaco must be **registered with the Service d'Information et de Contrôle sur les Circuits Financiers (SICCFIN)** and, in some cases, may require specific authorizations depending on the nature of services offered.
**Identification and Verification of the Client:**
**Natural Persons:** Obtain and verify the client's name, address, date and place of birth, nationality, and a unique identification number (e.g., passport or national ID card number). Verification must be based on reliable, independent source documents or data.
**Legal Entities:** Obtain and verify the name, legal form, address of the registered office, company registration number (if applicable), articles of association, and proof of legal existence and powers.
**Non-Face-to-Face Relationships:** Enhanced measures are required to mitigate the higher risk associated with non-face-to-face onboarding.
**Identification of the Beneficial Owner (BO):**
Identify the natural person(s) who ultimately own or control the client, directly or indirectly. For legal entities, this typically means anyone holding 25% or more of the shares or voting rights, or otherwise exercising control.
Verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) using reliable, independent source documents or data.
For trusts or similar arrangements, identify the settlors, trustees, protectors, beneficiaries, and any other natural person exercising ultimate effective control over the trust.
**Understanding the Purpose and Intended Nature of the Business Relationship:**
VASPs must gather information about why the client wishes to engage in virtual asset services, the types of transactions anticipated, and the expected volume and frequency.
**Ongoing Monitoring of the Business Relationship:**
Continuously scrutinize transactions undertaken throughout the course of the relationship to ensure they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the client, their business, and risk profile.
Update client identification data and beneficial ownership information immediately upon any change, not merely on a regular basis.
**When Required:** In situations presenting a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing. This includes, but is not limited to:
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), their family members, and close associates.
Monaco is itself identified as a high-risk third country by the EU and is under increased monitoring by the FATF
Complex, unusually large transactions, or unusual patterns of transactions that have no apparent economic or lawful purpose.
Non-face-to-face business relationships where the risk factors are not mitigated.
Relationships involving new technologies or products that favor anonymity.
**Measures:** EDD typically involves obtaining additional information on the client and BO, conducting enhanced verification, scrutinizing the source of funds and wealth, obtaining senior management approval for establishing or continuing the business relationship, and conducting increased ongoing monitoring.
Permitted only in specifically defined low-risk situations, where the VASP is satisfied that the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing are low. Such situations are generally limited and subject to strict conditions.
**Reporting Obligation:** If a VASP knows, suspects, or has reasonable grounds to suspect that funds, virtual assets, or transactions are related to criminal activity (including money laundering, terrorist financing, or predicate offenses), they must immediately report this to SICCFIN. This applies to both completed and attempted transactions.
**No Tipping-Off:** VASPs and their employees are strictly prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that a STR has been made or that a money laundering/terrorist financing investigation is being conducted.
**Immunity from Liability:** Entities and their employees who report suspicions in good faith are protected from legal liability for breach of confidentiality or any negative consequences arising from such a report.
**Identification Data:** Records of all documents and data used for client identification and verification, including beneficial owners.
**Transaction Records:** Records of all transactions, including the amount, currency (both fiat and virtual asset), date, type of transaction, and parties involved. This includes the originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers (often referred to as the "Travel Rule").
**Analysis and Decision-Making:** Records of all analysis undertaken for CDD, risk assessments, and the rationale behind any decisions regarding business relationships or transactions.
**STRs:** Copies of all suspicious transaction reports filed with SICCFIN.
**Duration:** Records must be retained for a minimum of **five years** from the end of the business relationship or the date of the occasional transaction. This period can be extended upon request by SICCFIN or judicial authorities.
**Service d'Information et de Contrôle sur les Circuits Financiers (SICCFIN):** This is Monaco's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and the primary administrative authority responsible for combating money laundering, terrorist financing, and corruption. It supervises AML/CFT compliance for all financial sectors, including virtual assets.
**Role:** SICCFIN acts as Monaco's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and is the administrative authority responsible for receiving, analyzing, and disseminating suspicious transaction reports. It is also the supervisory authority for AML/CFT compliance for many sectors, including virtual asset service providers. SICCFIN conducts inspections, issues guidance, and can impose administrative sanctions for non-compliance.
**Website:** https://www.siccfin.gouv.mc/ (or the English version: https://en.siccfin.gouv.mc/)
Implement a robust risk-based AML/CFT program.
Conduct thorough CDD, including BO identification and ongoing monitoring.
Report any suspicious activities to SICCFIN without delay.
Maintain comprehensive records for a minimum of five years.
Ensure adequate internal controls, staff training, and appointment of an AML/CFT Compliance Officer.
Monaco's specific regulatory framework for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) is not yet in place; the government has announced plans to introduce a new crypto framework by the end of 2026 to address gaps in its anti-money laundering regime.
Law No. 1.516 of 23 December 2021 on virtual assets, as amended by Law No. 1.575 of 17 June 2025
**Sovereign Ordinance No. 9.206 of 7 March 2022** implementing Law No. 1.516, which requires VASPs to obtain prior approval from the Minister of State after consulting the Commission de Contrôle des Activités Financières (CCAF) and to comply with AML/CFT obligations under the supervision of SICCFIN.
Enforcement in Monaco includes highly publicized, large-scale fines against specific entities, such as the €6 million fine imposed on UBS for compliance failures, alongside administrative warnings, corrective orders, or private settlements.
Monégasque authorities do publicize individual enforcement actions, as shown by the public disclosure of a €6 million fine against UBS for anti-money laundering failures, including details of specific violations like a 253-day delayed report.
**Commission de Contrôle des Activités Financières (CCAF):** The CCAF supervises all financial activities in the Principality, including the authorization and ongoing supervision of financial institutions and now, in consultation, VASPs.
**SICCFIN Annual Reports:** These reports provide aggregated statistics on suspicious activity reports, controls, and general trends, but typically do not name specific entities subject to enforcement or provide details of penalties.
*Example Report (latest available provides context for 2022 activities):* https://www.siccfin.mc/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Rapport_annuel_2022_SICCFIN.pdf (in French)
**Monaco's Legal Framework for Virtual Assets:**
**Law No. 1.516 of 23 December 2021 (Loi n° 1.516 du 23/12/2021 sur les actifs virtuels):** https://legimonaco.mc/305/legismclois.nsf/baf3e32b6183e874c125785000350d26/f675628b0561ae33c125879700344d2d?OpenDocument (in French)
**Sovereign Ordinance No. 9.206 of 7 March 2022 (Ordonnance Souveraine n° 9.206 du 07/03/2022 portant application de la loi n° 1.516 sur les actifs virtuels):** https://legimonaco.mc/305/legismclois.nsf/baf3e32b6183e874c125785000350d26/8966c8b9d997f37bc12587e60049ce41?OpenDocument (in French)
**MONEYVAL Reports:** Monaco is regularly assessed by MONEYVAL (Council of Europe's Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism). These reports provide an overview of Monaco's AML/CFT framework and its effectiveness, including for virtual assets.
*Example (latest follow-up report for Monaco, Oct 2023):* https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/-/moneyval-publishes-a-follow-up-report-on-monaco
**Loi n° 1.482 du 17 décembre 2019 relative aux actifs numériques (Law No. 1.482 of December 17, 2019 on Digital Assets):** This law defines digital assets, regulates initial coin offerings (ICOs), and requires VASPs to obtain authorization from the *Commission de Contrôle des Activités Financières* (CCAF).
**Loi n° 1.362 du 3 août 2009 modifiée, relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terrorisme et la corruption (Law No. 1.362 of August 3, 2009, as amended, on the Fight against Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Corruption):** This is the cornerstone AML/CFT law in Monaco. It designates VASPs as obliged entities and sets out their obligations, including customer due diligence (CDD), ongoing monitoring, record-keeping, and suspicious transaction reporting (STR) to the *Service d'Information et de Contrôle sur les Circuits Financiers* (SICCFIN).
**Sovereign Ordinances and Ministerial Decrees:** These instruments detail the implementation of international sanctions regimes (UN, EU) into Monegasque law.
**Compliance:** As a UN member state, Monaco is legally bound to implement all sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. These sanctions are primarily focused on terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and specific regimes/individuals.
**Implementation:** UN sanctions are typically transposed into Monegasque law through Sovereign Ordinances, making them directly applicable and enforceable within the Principality.
**Requirements for VASPs:** VASPs must immediately freeze funds and economic resources belonging to, or controlled by, individuals and entities designated on UN sanctions lists. They must also prohibit making funds or economic resources available to such sanctioned parties.
**Legal Reference:** UN Security Council Resolutions (e.g., those establishing sanctions committees like ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee) are implemented via Monaco's legal framework. An example of Monaco's implementing legislation would be a Sovereign Ordinance specifically referring to a UNSC resolution.
**Compliance:** While Monaco is not an EU member state, it has a close relationship with the EU and typically *transposes* or *mirrors* EU sanctions regulations into its national law, especially those concerning financial activities. This ensures alignment with its major economic partners and maintains its reputation as a sound financial center.
**Implementation:** EU restrictive measures (sanctions) are typically adopted by Monaco through Sovereign Ordinances or Ministerial Decrees, which reference the specific EU Council Regulations. This makes them legally binding within Monaco.
**Requirements for VASPs:** VASPs must comply with the adopted EU sanctions, which include:
**Asset Freezes:** Freezing funds and economic resources of designated individuals and entities (persons, groups, entities).
**Prohibition on Making Funds Available:** Not making funds or economic resources directly or indirectly available to or for the benefit of designated persons.
**Specific Sectoral Sanctions:** Adhering to restrictions on certain goods, services, or technologies (e.g., dual-use goods, luxury items, financial services, crypto-asset services for specific regions like Russia).
**Travel Bans:** Though less directly applicable to VASPs, these often accompany financial sanctions.
*General reference for EU sanctions:* EUR-Lex database (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/) for Council Regulations.
*Monaco's implementation:* Search the Journal de Monaco (https://journaldemonaco.gouv.mc/) for Sovereign Ordinances related to specific restrictive measures.
**Compliance:** The US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions are extra-territorial. While Monaco does not have a legal obligation to enforce OFAC sanctions directly through its national law, any Monegasque VASP that:
Deals with US persons (citizens, residents, entities).
Uses US financial institutions or payment processors.
Facilitates transactions involving US-origin technology or services.
**Requirements for VASPs:** VASPs must screen all their customers and transactions against OFAC's various sanctions lists, particularly the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List. They must also be aware of sectoral sanctions (e.g., Russia-related SSI List) and broader country-based sanctions programs.
**Legal Reference:** U.S. Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) website (https://ofac.treasury.gov/).
**Initial Onboarding:** Before establishing any business relationship.
**Ongoing Monitoring:** Regularly throughout the business relationship, particularly when lists are updated.
**Per-Transaction Screening:** For higher-risk transactions or for specific geographic areas.
**UN Sanctions Lists:** Consolidated lists published by the UN Security Council Sanctions Committees.
**EU Sanctions Lists:** The consolidated list of persons, groups, and entities subject to EU financial sanctions.
**OFAC Sanctions Lists:** Primarily the SDN List, but also other lists relevant to specific programs (e.g., SSI List, Non-SDN Palestinian Legislative Council List).
**Domestic Lists (if applicable):** Any specific lists published by SICCFIN or other Monegasque authorities.
**Prohibition on Services:** VASPs cannot offer services (e.g., exchange, custody, transfer) to individuals or entities located in, or ordinarily resident in, comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (e.g., Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria under OFAC; specific regions under EU sanctions like Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk).
**Heightened Due Diligence:** Transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions or jurisdictions under specific sanctions programs (even if not comprehensive bans) require enhanced due diligence and scrutiny.
**Origin/Destination of Funds:** VASPs must identify the origin and destination of virtual assets to ensure they are not directly or indirectly linked to sanctioned entities or regions.
**IP Address Blocking:** Implementing technical controls like IP blocking for regions subject to comprehensive sanctions can be part of a robust compliance program.
**Administrative Sanctions (imposed by SICCFIN):**
**Fines:** Significant monetary fines, which can be substantial and proportionate to the seriousness of the breach.
**Temporary or Permanent Suspension:** Suspension or revocation of operating licenses or authorization for VASPs.
**Specific Injunctions:** Orders to implement specific corrective measures.
**Imprisonment:** Individuals (e.g., compliance officers, directors) found responsible for serious violations, especially those involving intentional breaches or gross negligence, can face terms of imprisonment.
**Criminal Fines:** Substantial fines imposed by the judiciary.
**Reputational Damage:** Significant damage to the VASP's reputation, making it difficult to operate or secure banking relationships.
**Loss of License:** Permanent revocation of authorization.
**Loi n° 1.362 du 3 août 2009 sur la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terrorisme et la corruption (as amended), Titre VI (Sanctions).** Specific articles within this title detail the administrative and criminal penalties.
**Monaco's implementation of UN Lists:** The consolidated list of individuals and entities designated by UN Security Council sanctions committees.
**Monaco's implementation of EU Lists:** The consolidated list of persons, groups, and entities subject to EU restrictive measures.
**No separate "Monaco Sanctions List" for crypto:** VASPs will primarily be concerned with ensuring their compliance programs correctly integrate and screen against the international lists that Monaco has legally adopted.
Comprehensive screening against UN, EU (as transposed by Monaco), and OFAC sanctions lists.
Due diligence on all customers and transactions.
Understanding and adherence to geographic restrictions.
Procedures for asset freezing and reporting of hits or suspicious activities to SICCFIN.
Regular updates to screening systems and policies to reflect changes in sanctions regimes.
**Role:** The primary body responsible for approving and supervising Digital Asset Offerings (DAOs) under Law No. 1.492. It ensures compliance with the requirements for transparency, investor protection, and market integrity related to these public offerings.
**Role:** Monaco's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), responsible for enforcing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF) regulations across all financial sectors, including virtual assets. Virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are subject to SICCFIN's oversight regarding their AML/CTF obligations.
**Law No. 1.492 of July 8, 2020 on virtual assets:**
**Purpose:** This is the foundational law for virtual assets in Monaco. It defines "virtual assets" and "Digital Asset Offerings (DAOs)," establishing a framework for their issuance. It sets out the conditions and procedures for obtaining authorization from the CCAF for a DAO, including requirements for transparency, information disclosure, and issuer responsibility. The law aims to create a secure legal environment for blockchain projects.
**URL (Official Text - Journal de Monaco):** https://journaldemonaco.gouv.mc/Journaux/2020/Journal-8495/Loi-n-1.492-du-8-juillet-2020-sur-les-actifs-virtuels
**Sovereign Ordinance No. 8.239 of 23 October 2020 on the application of Law No. 1.492 of July 8, 2020 on virtual assets:**
**Purpose:** This ordinance provides the specific implementing details and procedures for Law No. 1.492, outlining the practical steps for obtaining DAO authorization and the ongoing obligations of authorized issuers.
**Law No. 1.362 of 8 July 2009 on the fight against money laundering, terrorist financing and corruption, as amended:**
**Date:** Original law July 8, 2009, significantly amended over time (e.g., in 2020 and 2022) to incorporate FATF recommendations and include virtual assets.
**Purpose:** This comprehensive AML/CTF law applies to all financial activities in Monaco, including those involving virtual assets. It mandates obligations for designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) and financial institutions, including virtual asset service providers (VASPs), to conduct customer due diligence (KYC), transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting to SICCFIN.
**URL (Consolidated text, unofficial source as official updates can be complex):** https://www.legimonaco.mc/625/legimonaco/Lois/2009/Loi-n-1-362-du-8-juillet-2009-relative-a-la-lutte-contre-le-blanchiment-de-capitaux-le-financement-du-terrorisme-et-la-corruption.html (This is a legal information portal for Monaco laws, not the official Journal, but often more up-to-date with amendments).
**No Specific Licensing for Trading (yet):** Law No. 1.492 primarily regulates the *issuance* of virtual assets (DAOs) and does not establish a distinct licensing regime specifically for virtual asset trading platforms or exchanges *as such*. Unlike some other jurisdictions, there isn't a dedicated "crypto exchange license" yet.
**Strong AML/CTF Obligations:** Any entity operating a virtual asset exchange, custody service, or other virtual asset service provider (VASP) in Monaco is strictly subject to the **AML/CTF framework** overseen by SICCFIN. This means they must:
Implement robust customer due diligence (Know Your Customer - KYC) procedures.
Monitor transactions for suspicious activities.
Report suspicious transactions to SICCFIN.
**General Business Licensing:** Companies wishing to establish a virtual asset trading platform or exchange in Monaco would also need to comply with general business establishment and licensing requirements applicable to any commercial entity in the Principality.
**Cautious but Open:** Monaco is keen to attract innovative blockchain and fintech businesses, and its DAO framework is a testament to this. However, it prioritizes financial integrity and investor protection. While not banning trading or exchanges, it ensures that any activities within its jurisdiction comply with international AML/CTF standards and its domestic legal framework.
**Adopted:** Yes, the FATF Travel Rule requirements are incorporated into Monegasque law.
**Key Legislation:** The primary legislative text that updated Monaco's AML/CFT framework to specifically address virtual assets and implement the Travel Rule is **Ordonnance Souveraine n° 8.761 du 10 novembre 2021 modifiant l'Ordonnance Souveraine n° 1.362 du 3 août 2009 relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terrorisme et la corruption** (Sovereign Ordinance No. 8.761 of November 10, 2021, amending Sovereign Ordinance No. 1.362 of August 3, 2009, on the fight against money laundering, terrorist financing, and corruption).
This Ordinance amended the fundamental AML/CFT law: **Loi n° 1.362 du 3 août 2009 relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux, le financement du terrorisme et la corruption**.
*Note: While the primary law is from 2009, it has been significantly amended over time to align with updated FATF recommendations, with the 2021 Ordinance being crucial for virtual assets.*
**Effective Date:** The Sovereign Ordinance n° 8.761 entered into force upon its publication, which was **November 19, 2021**.
Monaco generally follows the FATF Recommendation 16 for wire transfers and its application to virtual assets.
**For VASP-to-VASP transfers:** There is effectively **no de minimis threshold** for the mandatory information exchange for transfers between two obliged entities (VASPs). Full originator and beneficiary information must be collected and transmitted for *all* virtual asset transfers, regardless of value, between registered VASPs.
**For transfers involving an unhosted wallet (or transfers not between two obliged entities):** When a VASP initiates or receives a virtual asset transfer with an unhosted wallet, due diligence requirements (including collecting information about the originator/beneficiary) typically kick in. The **EUR 1,000 threshold** (or equivalent in other currencies/virtual assets) usually applies in scenarios where a VASP is interacting with a non-VASP entity, requiring the VASP to obtain and hold relevant information for transactions above this amount. Below this threshold, simplified due diligence might apply, but transaction monitoring remains crucial.
**Custody of digital assets or cryptographic keys** on behalf of third parties.
**Exchange services** between digital assets and fiat currencies, or between different digital assets.
**Operation of a trading platform** for digital assets.
**Transfer of digital assets** (which directly implicates the Travel Rule).
**Investment advice** on digital assets.
**Ensure the secure transmission** of the required originator and beneficiary information to the beneficiary VASP (or to the originator VASP when receiving funds).
**Adopt reliable and interoperable solutions** to facilitate this information exchange, allowing for seamless communication with other VASPs, domestically and internationally.
**Implement systems** that can handle both incoming and outgoing Travel Rule data.
**Verify the accuracy** of the information received and take appropriate action if discrepancies or missing information are identified.
**Maintain records** of all collected and transmitted information for at least five years.
**Name** (of the customer who initiated the transfer).
**Account number** (or unique transaction identifier, e.g., the sending wallet address/ID).
**Physical address** (of the customer).
**National identity number, customer identification number, or date and place of birth** (depending on the VASP's CDD records).
**Name** (of the customer who is the intended recipient).
**Administrative Sanctions:** The supervisory authorities (such as the Direction de l'Expansion Économique - DEE, and the Service d'Information et de Contrôle sur les Circuits Financiers - SICCFIN) can impose administrative sanctions, which may include:
Temporary or permanent withdrawal of authorization or registration.
Appointment of a provisional administrator.
**Financial Penalties:** Substantial monetary fines can be levied on institutions and their responsible individuals. These fines can range from thousands to millions of Euros, depending on the severity and recurrence of the breach. For example, severe breaches of AML/CFT obligations can lead to fines of up to EUR 5 million for legal entities and EUR 1 million for individuals, or even a percentage of the annual turnover.
**Criminal Penalties:** In cases of deliberate or systematic non-compliance, particularly where it facilitates money laundering or terrorist financing, criminal charges can be brought against the VASP and its management. This can result in imprisonment for individuals and higher fines for legal entities.
**Direction de l'Expansion Économique (DEE):** Responsible for the registration and supervision of VASPs in Monaco.
**Ordonnance Souveraine n° 8.761 du 10 novembre 2021 (the key implementing text for virtual assets and Travel Rule):** Journal de Monaco - Ordonnance Souveraine n° 8.761 du 10 novembre 2021
**Direction de l'Expansion Économique (DEE) – VASP Registration and Supervision:** DEE - Activités de Services sur Actifs Numériques (French)
Travel Rule
Travel rule data collection in progress.
Tax Reporting
Tax reporting data collection in progress.
Custody Requirements
Custody regulation data collection in progress.
Stablecoin Regulation
**E-money:** A stablecoin could be classified as e-money if it meets the definition under **Monaco's Law No. 1.339 of 7 September 2007 on Payment Services and Electronic Money**.
**Definition:** Electronic money is defined as electronically stored monetary value as represented by a claim on the issuer, which is issued on receipt of funds for the purpose of making payment transactions, and which is accepted by a natural or legal person other than the electronic money issuer.
**Implication:** If a stablecoin represents a claim on fiat currency at par and is used for payments, it would likely fall under this classification, triggering stringent e-money regulations.
**Payment Tokens / Utility Tokens:** Monaco's key legislation for digital assets is **Law No. 1.503 of 23 December 2020 on Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) and Digital Assets**, as amended by **Law No. 1.517 of 23 February 2022**.
This law defines "digital assets" and introduces a specific regime for "digital asset offerings" (ICOs) involving "utility tokens" or "security tokens."
A stablecoin not explicitly classified as e-money or a security but used as a means of payment could fall under the general definition of a "digital asset" and be subject to the AML/CFT provisions and the general principles of Law No. 1.503 regarding transparency and disclosure, particularly if issued via an ICO.
**Security Tokens:** If a stablecoin confers rights that are characteristic of financial instruments (e.g., rights to dividends, shares in profits, or debt instruments), it would likely be classified as a "security token" under Law No. 1.503, which then refers to **Monaco's Law No. 1.332 of 10 July 2007 on Financial Instruments**.
**Implication:** This would subject the stablecoin to securities regulations, including prospectus requirements, market abuse rules, and potentially oversight by the CCAF.
**If classified as E-money:** Under Law No. 1.339, e-money issuers are typically required to safeguard funds received in exchange for e-money. This usually involves holding funds in a separate account at a credit institution or investing them in secure, low-risk assets. The exact requirements would align with those for traditional e-money institutions.
**For other Digital Assets (non-e-money, non-security):** Law No. 1.503 itself does not impose explicit reserve requirements for *all* digital assets. However, for a stablecoin issued under an ICO, the white paper would need to clearly and comprehensively disclose the asset's backing mechanism, including details of any reserves, their composition, and audit procedures. Misleading information would be subject to penalties.
**If classified as a Security:** There are no direct "reserve requirements" for the token itself, but the issuer would be subject to general capital adequacy requirements for financial institutions.
**If classified as E-money:** Issuing e-money in Monaco requires prior authorization from the AMSF. The application process would involve demonstrating adequate capital, robust governance, risk management systems, and compliance with AML/CFT requirements.
**For Digital Asset Offerings (ICOs) under Law No. 1.503:** Any person or entity wishing to make a public offer of digital assets (an ICO) in Monaco, seeking authorization, must obtain prior authorization from the CCAF. This authorization is granted after the CCAF has approved the white paper detailing the digital asset.
**For Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs):** Monaco has implemented FATF recommendations. Any entity providing services related to virtual assets, such as custody, exchange, or transfer, would need to comply with AML/CFT regulations enforced by the AMSF and may require registration or licensing as a VASP.
**If classified as E-money:** Law No. 1.339 grants holders of e-money the right to redeem their e-money at par value at any time. This is a fundamental consumer protection feature of e-money regulations.
**For other Digital Assets (non-e-money):** Redemption rights would be entirely governed by the terms and conditions set out by the issuer in the white paper or other offering documents. Law No. 1.503 emphasizes the requirement for clear, precise, and non-misleading information regarding the rights attached to the digital asset.
Monaco does not have specific regulations addressing algorithmic stablecoins. Given the lack of direct asset backing, it would be challenging for an algorithmic stablecoin to be classified as "e-money" under current Monegasque law, as e-money typically implies a claim on tangible monetary value.
If an algorithmic stablecoin were issued via an ICO, Law No. 1.503 would require extremely detailed and transparent disclosure in the white paper about the algorithmic mechanism, the absence of direct fiat backing, the associated risks, and the volatility. Regulators (CCAF/AMSF) would scrutinize such offerings for investor protection and market integrity, potentially deeming them high-risk. Depending on its design, it might even be classified as a speculative security.
Monaco does not currently have its own Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) project. As a principality that uses the Euro and maintains close financial ties with the European Union, it would likely be highly influenced by the European Central Bank's (ECB) potential Digital Euro project.
If the ECB launches a Digital Euro, Monaco would likely adopt or integrate it within its financial system. A CBDC would represent the most stable and risk-free form of "stablecoin" and would likely set a benchmark for regulatory expectations and trust for private stablecoins operating in the same ecosystem. This could push Monaco's regulators to develop more specific rules for private stablecoins to ensure they meet high standards of stability and consumer protection.
**Autorité Monégasque de Sécurité Financière (AMSF):** The primary financial regulator.
**Law No. 1.503 of 23 December 2020 on Initial Coin Offerings and Digital Assets (as amended):** This is the core legislation for digital assets.
*While a direct, stable URL from the government for specific laws can be challenging, the law can be found through official Monegasque legislative databases or legal information services.* Search terms: "Loi n° 1.503 du 23 décembre 2020 relative aux offres de jetons" or "Loi n° 1.503 du 23/12/2020."
**Law No. 1.339 of 7 September 2007 on Payment Services and Electronic Money:** Relevant for e-money classification.
Search terms: "Loi n° 1.339 du 07/09/2007 sur les services de paiement et la monnaie électronique."
**Law No. 1.332 of 10 July 2007 on Financial Instruments:** Relevant for security classification.
Search terms: "Loi n° 1.332 du 10/07/2007 sur les instruments financiers."
Securities Classification
Securities classification data collection in progress.
Sanctions & Restrictions
Sanctions data collection in progress.
Research & Articles
Regulatory Forecast
high confidenceLikely AML/CFT regulation update expected around 2026-05-22
Based on 252 historical regulatory events for Monaco, averaging every 24 days, with decreasing regulatory activity.
Recent Updates
**For other Digital Assets (non-e-money, non-security):** Law No. 1.503 itself does not impose explicit reserve requi...
**For other Digital Assets (non-e-money, non-security):** Law No. 1.503 itself does not impose explicit reserve requirements for *all* digital assets. However, for a stablecoin issued under an ICO, the white paper would need to clearly and comprehensively disclose the asset's backing mechanism, including details of any reserves, their composition, and audit procedures. Misleading information would be subject to penalties.
**For Digital Asset Offerings (ICOs) under Law No. 1.503:** Any person or entity wishing to make a public offer of di...
**For Digital Asset Offerings (ICOs) under Law No. 1.503:** Any person or entity wishing to make a public offer of digital assets (an ICO) in Monaco, seeking authorization, must obtain prior authorization from the CCAF. This authorization is granted after the CCAF has approved the white paper detailing the digital asset.
**For Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs):** Monaco has implemented FATF recommendations. Any entity providing se...
**For Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs):** Monaco has implemented FATF recommendations. Any entity providing services related to virtual assets, such as custody, exchange, or transfer, would need to comply with AML/CFT regulations enforced by the AMSF and may require registration or licensing as a VASP.
If an algorithmic stablecoin were issued via an ICO, Law No. 1.503 would require extremely detailed and transparent d...
If an algorithmic stablecoin were issued via an ICO, Law No. 1.503 would require extremely detailed and transparent disclosure in the white paper about the algorithmic mechanism, the absence of direct fiat backing, the associated risks, and the volatility. Regulators (CCAF/AMSF) would scrutinize such offerings for investor protection and market integrity, potentially deeming them high-risk. Depending on its design, it might even be classified as a speculative security.
Monaco does not currently have its own Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) project. As a principality that uses the ...
Monaco does not currently have its own Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) project. As a principality that uses the Euro and maintains close financial ties with the European Union, it would likely be highly influenced by the European Central Bank's (ECB) potential Digital Euro project.
**No Specific Licensing for Trading (yet):** Law No. 1.492 primarily regulates the *issuance* of virtual assets (DAOs...
**No Specific Licensing for Trading (yet):** Law No. 1.492 primarily regulates the *issuance* of virtual assets (DAOs) and does not establish a distinct licensing regime specifically for virtual asset trading platforms or exchanges *as such*. Unlike some other jurisdictions, there isn't a dedicated "crypto exchange license" yet.
**Cautious but Open:** Monaco is keen to attract innovative blockchain and fintech businesses, and its DAO framework ...
**Cautious but Open:** Monaco is keen to attract innovative blockchain and fintech businesses, and its DAO framework is a testament to this. However, it prioritizes financial integrity and investor protection. While not banning trading or exchanges, it ensures that any activities within its jurisdiction comply with international AML/CTF standards and its domestic legal framework.
**Effective Date:** The Sovereign Ordinance n° 8.761 entered into force upon its publication, which was **November 19...
**Effective Date:** The Sovereign Ordinance n° 8.761 entered into force upon its publication, which was **November 19, 2021**.
**Financial Penalties:** Substantial monetary fines can be levied on institutions and their responsible individuals. ...
**Financial Penalties:** Substantial monetary fines can be levied on institutions and their responsible individuals. These fines can range from thousands to millions of Euros, depending on the severity and recurrence of the breach. For example, severe breaches of AML/CFT obligations can lead to fines of up to EUR 5 million for legal entities and EUR 1 million for individuals, or even a percentage of the annual turnover.
**Criminal Penalties:** In cases of deliberate or systematic non-compliance, particularly where it facilitates money ...
**Criminal Penalties:** In cases of deliberate or systematic non-compliance, particularly where it facilitates money laundering or terrorist financing, criminal charges can be brought against the VASP and its management. This can result in imprisonment for individuals and higher fines for legal entities.
DEE can impose the following specific administrative sanctions on VASPs and their responsible individuals:
DEE can impose the following specific administrative sanctions on VASPs and their responsible individuals:
These sanctions are defined in Articles 32-38 of Ordonnance n° 8.718, which governs the enforcement powers of the DEE...
These sanctions are defined in Articles 32-38 of Ordonnance n° 8.718, which governs the enforcement powers of the DEE over regulated entities Ordonnance n° 8.718 - Articles 32-38
SICCFIN's enforcement powers are **limited to administrative measures** such as:
SICCFIN's enforcement powers are **limited to administrative measures** such as:
Under Loi n° 1.362, Article 23-1, VASPs and their responsible individuals can face administrative fines ranging from ...
Under Loi n° 1.362, Article 23-1, VASPs and their responsible individuals can face administrative fines ranging from **€5,000 to €500,000** for AML/CFT breaches Loi n° 1.362 - Article 23-1
The fine amount is determined based on a factor-based approach:
The fine amount is determined based on a factor-based approach:
For **corruption offenses** specifically (Article 1-2 of Loi n° 1.362), the penalty framework is identical to AML/CFT...
For **corruption offenses** specifically (Article 1-2 of Loi n° 1.362), the penalty framework is identical to AML/CFT breaches: DEE can impose administrative fines up to €500,000, and individuals can face fines up to €150,000. There are no distinct, separate corruption-specific penalty tiers Loi n° 1.362 - Corruption Provisions
As of 2025, Monaco has not publicly disclosed a VASP-specific enforcement case involving fines, likely due to the sma...
As of 2025, Monaco has not publicly disclosed a VASP-specific enforcement case involving fines, likely due to the small number of licensed VASPs (fewer than 5 as of 2024) Monaco VASP Landscape - FATF
The most recent high-profile enforcement action in Monaco, not VASP-specific but illustrative, was the 2022 fine of €...
The most recent high-profile enforcement action in Monaco, not VASP-specific but illustrative, was the 2022 fine of €1.2 million against a real estate firm for AML failures, with fines imposed by DEE. This demonstrates the authority's willingness to use maximum penalty thresholds Monaco AML Fine 2022 - Reuters
No publicly available enforcement database or case registry exists for VASP-specific actions; the Journal de Monaco p...
No publicly available enforcement database or case registry exists for VASP-specific actions; the Journal de Monaco publishes sanction decisions on a case-by-case basis, but only when the penalty is challenged or publicly disclosed Journal de Monaco - Sanctions
**Administrative and criminal proceedings are cumulative, not mutually exclusive**. Monaco law explicitly allows both...
**Administrative and criminal proceedings are cumulative, not mutually exclusive**. Monaco law explicitly allows both tracks to proceed simultaneously for the same underlying conduct (Article 23-5 of Loi n° 1.362) Loi n° 1.362 - Cumulative Sanctions
**No double jeopardy risk** under Monaco law: Administrative fines and criminal penalties are considered distinct und...
**No double jeopardy risk** under Monaco law: Administrative fines and criminal penalties are considered distinct under the legal framework (administrative sanctions are regulatory; criminal penalties are punitive under criminal code)
**Practical sequence**: Administrative sanctions typically precede criminal charges. A VASP first receives a DEE warn...
**Practical sequence**: Administrative sanctions typically precede criminal charges. A VASP first receives a DEE warning or fine; if non-compliance persists, the case is escalated to criminal proceedings. However, for egregious cases (e.g., active money laundering facilitation), criminal charges can be brought immediately without prior administrative action Monaco Prosecution Policy - SICCFIN Report
SICCFIN Administrative Sanctions - Journal de Monaco Search
SICCFIN Administrative Sanctions - Journal de Monaco Search
Reuters - Monaco AML Fine 2022
Reuters - Monaco AML Fine 2022
Monaco Enforcement Appeal Rules
Monaco Enforcement Appeal Rules
This profile is maintained by AI research workers and updated regularly. Connect via MCP for programmatic access.